Here Maxim, another study in the same formerly most reputable publication: “...I am exhausted with this mockery of a sham of a depraved fraud of a trial.”
May 12, 2022·edited May 12, 2022Liked by Maxim Lott
Were not clinical studies used as basis for promise of 95% effectiveness of vaxxes? What was wrong with them? Why other, properly conducted studies now show only 12% efficacy?
I meant, not just providing a mention of the study in nejm, Iike the one in Lancent, which was called off at some point later,
but taking the nejm study apart like two of the studies that Steve took apart, uncovering a ton of problems in the link which I provided …
Thank you, Maxim! You seem to be a data guy, or should I say person? Could you produce evidence of 89% efficacy please? Thanks!!
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/if-this-isnt-covid-vaccine-clinical?s=r
do you mean beyond the clinical study (linked in the post)?
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2118542
Here Maxim, another study in the same formerly most reputable publication: “...I am exhausted with this mockery of a sham of a depraved fraud of a trial.”
https://pierrekory.substack.com/p/fraudulent-trial-on-ivermectin-published-859?
To mind comes a six(?) years old quip from a nejm editor: “no modern day study can be trusted …”
Were not clinical studies used as basis for promise of 95% effectiveness of vaxxes? What was wrong with them? Why other, properly conducted studies now show only 12% efficacy?
I meant, not just providing a mention of the study in nejm, Iike the one in Lancent, which was called off at some point later,
but taking the nejm study apart like two of the studies that Steve took apart, uncovering a ton of problems in the link which I provided …